General Discussion Forgotten Chicago Forum
Feel free to discuss anything related to the website here.
Riverview
Posted by:
jessesgirl
(---.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net)
Date: August 06, 2009 01:16AM
I don't see any posts about Riverview which was such a big part of Chicago. I have very vague memories, but love to hear stories about it. It closed before I was a teen so my expierences are limited, but I lived not far away.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
marfair
(---.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
Date: August 07, 2009 06:29PM
I have many memories about the park, but to be brief, the towering parachute ride visible for blocks before reaching Belmont and Western has to be my most lasting impression.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
fleurblue
(---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: August 08, 2009 01:35AM
Saw this site somewhere; I think posted on Forgotten Chicago. I just bookmarked it because I didn't see all of it yet myself. Looks very interesting!
Riverview was an exciting place for my family. They used to have 2 cent days and 10 cent rides on other days. My uncles worked for Bell & Howell and they sponsored an evening at the park. We all got free ride and food coupons.
It was gritty and smelly (mouldy Tunnel of Love and canvas cover to the Caterpillar). The side show with the snake woman and others filled you with awe and a bit of sympathy as did the dunking booths filled with all black men.
This was not Great America--it was real unvarnished America.
http://riverviewparkchicago.com/
Riverview was an exciting place for my family. They used to have 2 cent days and 10 cent rides on other days. My uncles worked for Bell & Howell and they sponsored an evening at the park. We all got free ride and food coupons.
It was gritty and smelly (mouldy Tunnel of Love and canvas cover to the Caterpillar). The side show with the snake woman and others filled you with awe and a bit of sympathy as did the dunking booths filled with all black men.
This was not Great America--it was real unvarnished America.
http://riverviewparkchicago.com/
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
tomcat630
(---.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
Date: August 13, 2009 11:29PM
Rumor is that Mayor Daley [the first] wanted it gone, since it took up a lot of police time and social tensions of the time.
Brother and I would ask to go and folks would say 'no it's in a bad area'.
Brother and I would ask to go and folks would say 'no it's in a bad area'.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
Adella1
(---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: September 10, 2009 05:29AM
Just type in Riverview Park Chicago in the search on the web they are there and lot's of them
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
daveg
(130.36.62.---)
Date: October 07, 2009 02:27PM
Remember 2 Ton Baker who was the "voice" of Riverview?
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
chuck
(---.176.244.66.biz.sta.networkgci.net)
Date: October 09, 2009 12:44PM
Is there anything left of Riverview these days? I thought I remember reading that the base of the water ride was still out there.
Chuck
http://www.chucksphotospot.com
Chuck
http://www.chucksphotospot.com
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
daveg
(130.36.62.---)
Date: October 09, 2009 05:50PM
chuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there anything left of Riverview these days? I
> thought I remember reading that the base of the
> water ride was still out there.
I don't think anything is really left of the park. Saw a few pics of what was described to be the base of a few rides that were level with the ground, but the area was so overgrown and/or re-purposed I'm not sure how anyone could have identified the stuff. Certainly nothing obvious, at least to my eyes. Wonder if the Chicago River holds some secrets?
I'll close with saying that I have not been there since I was a kid, so **maybe** some stuff was saved and is on the site.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there anything left of Riverview these days? I
> thought I remember reading that the base of the
> water ride was still out there.
I don't think anything is really left of the park. Saw a few pics of what was described to be the base of a few rides that were level with the ground, but the area was so overgrown and/or re-purposed I'm not sure how anyone could have identified the stuff. Certainly nothing obvious, at least to my eyes. Wonder if the Chicago River holds some secrets?
I'll close with saying that I have not been there since I was a kid, so **maybe** some stuff was saved and is on the site.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
fleurblue
(---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: October 09, 2009 11:44PM
The river may hold some secrets. There was a ride at the back of the park near the river. It was a revolving tower to which airplanes were hung by chains. As I recall the planes were pretty big and held several passengers. The planes loaded at ground level and the ride would slowly spin until the planes hung almost straight out--there are variations of this ride everywhere.
I remember hearing that the chains broke on one of the planes and it was hurled into the river. (If so, better than into the crowds.) I don't know any more of the details. Of course the plane was recovered but there may be other stuff at the river bottom; old souvenirs, etc.
I remember hearing that the chains broke on one of the planes and it was hurled into the river. (If so, better than into the crowds.) I don't know any more of the details. Of course the plane was recovered but there may be other stuff at the river bottom; old souvenirs, etc.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
Jeff_Weiner
(---.sub-70-194-99.myvzw.com)
Date: January 14, 2016 02:46AM
Sounds like an interesting urban archaeology project.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
Jeff_Weiner
(---.sub-70-194-97.myvzw.com)
Date: February 11, 2016 03:46AM
My parents always waxed nostalgic about Riverview, but by the time I was old enough, they said the place had deteriorated that they didn't want to take me there.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
the_mogra
(---.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
Date: February 11, 2016 12:47PM
no deterioration at all in Riverview's final years, they always kept it sharp & spotless and I enjoyed it to the very end.
I think about the western ave overpass there very soon to be demolished. Riverview gets the wrecking ball in 1967, and the overpass built for the sake of it (a few years earlier) proves useful for another 49 years before it's appointment with the same wrecking ball, even though the original traffic congestion issue is long gone. Both whacky and ironic outcome in my view
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/11/2016 12:48PM by the_mogra.
I think about the western ave overpass there very soon to be demolished. Riverview gets the wrecking ball in 1967, and the overpass built for the sake of it (a few years earlier) proves useful for another 49 years before it's appointment with the same wrecking ball, even though the original traffic congestion issue is long gone. Both whacky and ironic outcome in my view
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/11/2016 12:48PM by the_mogra.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
Jeff_Weiner
(---.sub-70-194-77.myvzw.com)
Date: February 11, 2016 02:07PM
They'll regret tearing that overpass down, since it also helps traffic to/from Clybourn. But what does an old traffic engineer know?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/14/2016 12:46AM by Jeff_Weiner.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/14/2016 12:46AM by Jeff_Weiner.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
the_mogra
(---.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
Date: February 11, 2016 02:51PM
the overpass speeds traffic on western ave - and speeds it right past the police station (which didn't exist when the overpass was first built). the city doesn't like that. that's why when the central ave overpass was re-built they trimmed its north end so it wouldn't speed traffic past the police station @ grand ave (which also wasn't there when that overpass was first built). you know nowadays Chicago would never do something like build an overpass for the sake of traffic congestion caused my an amusement park. for all the win-win situations foisted by the powers that be, karma requires a balance with the western ave overpass--the demolition of which is a lose-lose proposition if ever there was one
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
PKDickman
(---.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net)
Date: February 11, 2016 06:54PM
Jeff_Weiner Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They'll regret tearing that overpass down, since
> it also helps traffic to/from Clybourn. But what
> dos an old traffic engineer know?
What they really want to do is turn Western into a class II truck route.
Right now it it ends at that overpass. The width is too narrow for 4 truck lanes, So they either have to rebuild it wider or tear it down and use the full 100' ROW on Western. Which do you think is cheaper?
I wouldn't worry about Clybourn. The AADT is bupkis up there. Something like 8500.
-------------------------------------------------------
> They'll regret tearing that overpass down, since
> it also helps traffic to/from Clybourn. But what
> dos an old traffic engineer know?
What they really want to do is turn Western into a class II truck route.
Right now it it ends at that overpass. The width is too narrow for 4 truck lanes, So they either have to rebuild it wider or tear it down and use the full 100' ROW on Western. Which do you think is cheaper?
I wouldn't worry about Clybourn. The AADT is bupkis up there. Something like 8500.
Re: Riverview
Posted by:
Jeff_Weiner
(---.sub-70-194-100.myvzw.com)
Date: February 14, 2016 12:47AM
PKDickman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What they really want to do is turn Western into a
> class II truck route.
> Right now it it ends at that overpass. The width
> is too narrow for 4 truck lanes, So they either
> have to rebuild it wider or tear it down and use
> the full 100' ROW on Western. Which do you think
> is cheaper?
> I wouldn't worry about Clybourn. The AADT is
> bupkis up there. Something like 8500.
Well, I'm out of that loop now.
-------------------------------------------------------
> What they really want to do is turn Western into a
> class II truck route.
> Right now it it ends at that overpass. The width
> is too narrow for 4 truck lanes, So they either
> have to rebuild it wider or tear it down and use
> the full 100' ROW on Western. Which do you think
> is cheaper?
> I wouldn't worry about Clybourn. The AADT is
> bupkis up there. Something like 8500.
Well, I'm out of that loop now.
